首页> 外文OA文献 >From Access to Engagement: Measuring Retention in Outpatient HIV Clinical Care
【2h】

From Access to Engagement: Measuring Retention in Outpatient HIV Clinical Care

机译:从接触到参与:衡量门诊艾滋病毒临床护理的保留率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Engagement in HIV care is increasingly recognized as a crucial step in maximizing individual patient outcomes. The recently updated HIV Medicine Association primary HIV care guidelines include a new recommendation highlighting the importance of extending adherence beyond antiretroviral medications to include adherence to clinical care. Beyond individual health, emphasis on a “test and treat” approach to HIV prevention highlights the public health importance of engagement in clinical care as an essential intermediary between the putative benefits of universal HIV testing (“test”) followed by ubiquitous antiretroviral treatment (“treat”). One challenge to administrators, researchers and clinicians who want to systematically evaluate HIV clinical engagement is deciding on how to measure retention in care. Measuring retention is complex as this process includes multiple clinic visits (repeated measures) occurring longitudinally over time. This article provides a synthesis of five commonly used measures of retention in HIV care, highlighting their methodological and conceptual strengths and limitations, and suggesting situations where certain measures may be preferred over others. The five measures are missed visits, appointment adherence, visit constancy, gaps in care, and the Human Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau (HRSA HAB) performance measure for retention in HIV care. As has been noted for antiretroviral medication adherence, there is no gold standard to measure retention in care, and consideration of the advantages and limitations of each measure, particularly in the context of the desired application, should guide selection of a retention measure.
机译:参与艾滋病毒护理越来越被认为是最大程度地提高患者个体结局的关键步骤。最近更新的HIV医学协会主要HIV护理指南包括一项新建议,强调了将依从性扩展到抗逆转录病毒药物之外的重要性,包括对临床护理的依从性。除个人健康外,对“预防和治疗”艾滋病毒预防方法的强调还强调了参与临床护理的公共卫生重要性,这是普遍HIV检测(“测试”)的推定益处与无所不在的抗逆转录病毒治疗(“对待”)。想要系统评估HIV临床参与度的管理人员,研究人员和临床医生面临的一项挑战是,决定如何衡量对护理的保留程度。测量保留率很复杂,因为此过程包括随着时间的推移纵向发生的多次门诊(重复措施)。本文总结了五个常用的保留在HIV护理中的措施,重点介绍了它们在方法和概念上的优势和局限性,并提出了某些措施可能比其他措施更可取的情况。这五项措施包括:错诊,约会依从性,访问稳定性,护理差距以及人力资源和服务管理局艾滋病毒/艾滋病局(HRSA HAB)保留艾滋病毒的绩效指标。如针对抗逆转录病毒药物依从性所指出的那样,尚无用于衡量护理保留率的金标准,并且考虑每种方法的优点和局限性,尤其是在所需应用的情况下,应指导选择保留方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号